Safety Before LNG
Exposing the truth about the Hess 'Shannon LNG' project
Negative Effects on the Shannon Estuary
Nevada LNG Explosion

Press Releases

Press Release 20th April 2010: 'Safety Before LNG' says it has no choice but to break a local taboo and opppose the Endesa gas project until a Strategic Assessment is completed as requested by the EU Commission; says Endesa will become a hostage to Hess/Shannon LNG gas.

'Safety Before LNG' says that it has no choice, but to challenge a local taboo subject and object to the entirety of the Endesa gas-fired power plant until a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) is first undertaken of the Hess/Shannon LNG project as demanded by the EU Commission in January.

This position was confirmed and validated when, on April 15th, 2010, the Commission for Energy Reguation (CER) gave Shannon LNG a 25-year exemption from regulated third-party access to the propsed LNG terminal.  Endesa had requested that 30% of the terminal capacity should be subjected to regulated third-party access to maintain its independence but the CER refused.  This will now make Endesa a hostage of Shannon LNG - as the nearest national grid access is 26 kilometres away - unless the EU overturns the CER decision.

Recent media revelations in the United States of America highlighted the control Shannon LNG will have over another gas-fired power plant it plans adjacent to the proposed LNG terminal.

It is crazy in the current trend away from fossil fuels to renewable energy and our supposedly strong committment to the Kyoto protocol in the fight against climate change that we are even thinking of building 2 new gas-fired power plants with an initial capacity of 700 Megawatts that will be fed exclusively by the Cayman-Island registered Hess LNG gas without the slightest Strategic Assessment.

We accuse the Irish authorities of legal corruption, where decisions with huge strategic consequences are being made with nods and winks, where who you know is more important than what  you have to offer the country and where only lip service is paid to EU Directives.

We believe that the LNG terminal will sterilise the entire Shannon Estuary from further development and challenge any politican to prove to us that the massive transhipment hub for the Estuary, which would give hundreds of  sustainable jobs, is still possible.

At the oral hearing, Endesa announced that the number of full time jobs at the plant will drop to 38. This will come as a big blow to the community following the news on December 3rd 2009 that Endesa had entered into negotiations with the unions to reduce the workforce from 90 to 55 from a high of 240 people at the plant 4 years. The number of people working at the power plant was  down to 126 last year but a drop to 38 is felt to be a skeleton crew. The construction jobs will be a welcome short-term boost to the local economy, but they are not sustainable (see )

Please consult our website press release pages for further information.