Press
Release February 8th 2018:
An Bord Pleanála, in a breach of trust, decides that extending the
expiring planning permission for the proposed Shannon LNG terminal is a
"Material Change" and then, 26 days later, changes its mind.
Claims Double Decisioning of same case a breach of An Bord Pleanála Code of Conduct.
In
an unprecedented move in Irish Planning history, An Bord Pleanála has
reversed
one of its own planning decisions it made 26 days previously to the
advantage
of Shannon LNG - a double-decisioning of the same case which
represents, in our view, a breach of An Bord Pleanála's own Code
of Conduct which members of the Board are statutorily obliged to
comply with. We are concerned that An Bord Pleanála is not showing the
maximum degree of accountability consistent with the quasi-judicial
nature of the Board’s functions.
On March 31st 2018 - next month - planning permission for the proposed
controversial Shannon LNG project will expire. The now shelf-company-owned
Shannon LNG has paid €30,000 to make an application to An Bord Pleanála
directly under the Strategic Infrastructure Act 2006 to extend the planning for
another 5 years with no decision-making role for the local authority Kerry
County Council.
In deciding whether to refuse permission to extend planning permission 2 major
decisions are required.
The first, the most difficult to overcome, is whether extending planning
permission constitutes a material change.
If the change is deemed material then a second decision is required on whether
the changes would have "significant effects on the environment".
This second decision was considered by environmental groups to be the easiest
to prove since the land is currently agricultural grazing land and no
development has taken place in the 10 years.
If the alteration is deemed both material and having a significant effect on
the environment then it is almost certain that Shannon LNG would be refused
permission to extend planning permission beyond the 10 years at the end of next
month.
An Bord Pleanála made the first decision that it was a material change and
ordered a public consultation on the second easier question on whether the
changes would have significant effects on the environment.
However, 26 days later, the Board, without any legal reason provided, and
without any provision in legislation, overturned its own planning decision to
the benefit of the shelf-company-owned Shannon LNG and has asked for a public
consultation on the material change with only 14 days’ notice.
This revocation of its own planning decision by An Bord Pleanála is a cause for
grave concern and is, in our opinion, an abuse of process and a sleight of
hand.
An Bord Pleanála has the power of the Higher Courts and its decisions can only
be challenged on a point of law, process or fact in the High Court.
That the Board could make a decision, inform in writing all parties to the
planning application of this decision and then 26 days later change its mind
without any explanation brings into question the independence of the The Board
and is, what we consider to be, a breach of Trust.
Does this mean that when anybody receives a letter from An Bord Pleanála, they
can now assume that the decision in the letter might not be true at all and may
be revoked a few weeks later? This is setting a dangerous precedent which may be used in court proceedings in the future.
The question that has to be asked is: Is there undue external pressure on An
Bord Pleanála or a conflict of interest within members of An Bord Pleanála that
allows its decisions on the Shannon LNG project to be changed at will?
A higher standard
is expected of An Bord Pleanála when it is dealing with
applications through the Strategic Infrastructure Act 2006 that bypass
local authorities as in this case and which have no process of
appeal of planning issues other than through the Courts which is mainly
the reserve of the rich.
We
also believe that this double decisioning by An Bord Pleanála is a
clear breach of the Code of Conduct, which by law it is obliged to
uphold.
We
are not now convinced that An Bord Pleanála is
carrying out its work in an independent manner that embodies the public
service ethos of integrity, impartiality and a desire to serve the
public interest while giving due consideration to all legitimate
viewpoints and interests.
We
are especially concerned that An Bord Pleanála is not showing the
maximum degree of accountability consistent with the quasi-judicial
nature of the Board’s functions. The Code of Conduct states that it is
essential that proper procedures are followed in the interests of
fairness and of
natural and constitutional justice. Proper procedures are clearly not
being followed in this instance. The code of Conduct also obliges The
Board "t
o ensure that decisions are based on clearly stated considerations and reasons." No reason for the double decisioning was given in this instance either.
Background:
On January 11th 2018 An Bord Pleanála informed Shannon LNG
that:
"the
Board has decided, in accordance with section 146B(2)(b) of the Act, that the
proposed alteration would constitute a material alteration to the terms of the
development".
The Board directed that Shannon LNG advertise in two newspapers that
submissions or observations could be made in writing to the Board within a
period of 4 week on whether the alteration would have "significant effects
on the environment".
The Board sent this information to all individuals and groups who made
submissions to the original planning ten years previously informing them of
this decision.
However,
on February 6th 2018 - An Bord Pleanála wrote to all the same people and groups
it had written to 26 days earlier to inform them that
"The
Board has subsequently revised the letter which issued to Shannon LNG"
and was
now inviting submissions before it decided whether the extension of planning
was a material change - something it had already decided. In addition,
the public would only have 14 days to submit submissions on this altered
question, instead of the standard 4 weeks.
- Ends -
Notes to the Editor:
1. The
American Company Hess that created the
Irish Subsidiary Shannon LNG for the purpose of the proposed LNG plant
has completely abandoned the project - both publicly and legally. Shannon LNG has now became
little more than a shelf company entirely owned by Sambolo Resources, a company
registered in Dublin whose 2 shareholders are the CEO of Shannon LNG (Paddy
Power) and his son John with Sarah
Govereny as company secretary.
2.
The owner of the land, Shannon Properties (formerly known as Shannon
Development), has put the land up for sale and is just trying to sweat
the asset as land with planning permission
for an LNG terminal. |