Shannon
LNG - Official Petition Against Development Consent for US
Fracked Gas Import Terminal in Ireland by New Fortress Energy - Have your say
'Safety
Before LNG' has launched a grass-roots petition
inviting signatures from people everywhere against the US
fracked gas import terminal proposed in Ireland by New Fortress Energy.
Please feel free to add your name using the form below or by clicking here
The list of 1,545 signatories was officially lodged with the Irish
Planning Authorities on October 22nd, 2021 but the petition will stay
open for more signatories until the planning decision is made.
-
Local
Environmental campaigners on the Shannon Estuary
feel completely deceived and betrayed by the Green Party who
they now
consider as fake environmentalists
- No
guidelines - only a notification - sent to An Bord Pleanála
because the policy is "not a policy of the Minister for Housing, Local
Government and Heritage".
A "notification"
only obliges the planning authority to "have regard" to government
policy, whereas "guidelines" would oblige the planning authority to
"comply" with Government Policy.
Chairman
Leddin of the Green Party now seen as the fracked gas industry champion
in Government. Minister Ryan also has questions to answer on how he
moved in the Dáil on the same today to prevent a fracked gas
import ban
being amended to the Climate Bill
Barrister
John Kenny on how Shannon LNG is a breach of Human Rights Dublin 19
December 2019
Why
is the US putting so much pressure on the EU to import US fracked gas?
The
latest peer-reviewed scientific studies
have found that one third of the total
increased methane emissions from all sources globally, over the past
decade, is
coming from US fracked gas (shale gas).
With
this backdrop, on December 20th, 2019, the US imposed sanctions on the German
Nordstream2 pipeline being built to bring non-fracked gas
directly from Russia
under the Baltic sea to stop Russian gas competing with the US fracked
gas
imports into Europe
"Dig a well, Bring a
soldier home" was
a slogan in the USA several years ago when America was a net importer
of gas.
Now, with fracking (and over 1.7 million wells later
and counting), the
U.S. has become
a net exporter of fracked gas. The rush is on to find a new overseas
market for
U.S. methane before the fracking bubble bursts in the USA.
This
was followed on with a bill passed in U.S. House of Representatives on
March 25th, 2019 (the "European Energy
Security and Diversification Act of 2019") that, if it becomes law,would allocate hundreds of
millions
of US dollars in federal funding over
two years to public and private energy development projects in Europe
and
Eurasia, including LNG terminals, with the potential to use US gas -
gas it now
markets as "Freedom Gas".
The
message from the NordStream2 sanctions is now clear for all to see that
importing US fracked gas has nothing to do about bringing "freedom"
gas to Europe. Rather, it is about locking Europe into buying US
fracked gas
for decades to come, with no consideration of the Climate impacts given
that
the US has signalled its intention to withdraw
from the Paris Accord.
The US is now using all its political, economic and diplomatic power to
force
Europe to buy its filthy fracked gas.
The
focus of climate change mitigation actions (as opposed to Climate
Adaptation) is
to reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions which are driving climate
change.
On
Climate Mitigation grounds, European Fracked gas LNG import
infrastructure cannot
reasonably be expanded at Shannon, Cork and elsewhere throughout Europe
because
scientific evidence has found that purposeful and leaked/fugitive
methane
emissions from fracked gas is accelerating global warming with fracked
gas
imports having a carbon equivalent footprint 44% greater than coal over
the
full life cycle.
Amazingly,
however, unlike
the case for carbon dioxide, the Climate System responds quickly to a
reduction in
methane emissions and could provide the opportunity to immediately slow
the
rate of global warming by around half a degree celsius
Schindell
et al, 2012
Because
methane, with a half-life in the atmosphere of 12 years is faster acting than
carbon dioxide, it means that an effective reduction in
methane emissions in the short term would buy us some desperately
needed time
to do a complete reconstruction of our energy system. Methane
reductions are
critical and the Science is now clear that we will not reach our Paris
Accordtarget of keeping the
planet well
below 2degrees
Celsius above the
pre-industrial baselinewith CO2
reductions alone.
Given
that the latest peer-reviewed scientific studies have found that one third of
the total increased methane emissions from all sources globally over
the past
decade is coming from US fracked gas (shale gas) it
is now clear that intense US pressure to find new overseas markets for
its
Methane from fracking - such as in The Trade Deal between the US and
Europe in
July 2018 which agreed an Energy Plan for Europe to build more
terminals to
import LNG from the US on a massive scale - is no
longer sustainable because the US is putting Trade before Climate.
Importing
US fracked gas into countries which have banned fracking, like Ireland,
amounts
to "carbon leakage" because Europe does not count non-territorial
emissions in its carbon budgets. On July 16th, 2019, in a major policy
turnaround, EU Commission President-elect Ursula Von der Leyen
announced that
she would "introduce a carbon
border
tax to avoid carbon leakage". Discussion of the non-territorial
emissions
from the importation of US fracked gas into Europe, the carbon leakage
issue of
the next decade, is currently being met with a total silence and a
reckless refusal
to engage by theEuropean
Commission,
but such refusal is more and more incompatible with a declared
intention by
President Von der Leyen to fight runaway global warming. Any new fossil
gas
infrastructure will amount to a fossil fuel lock in as the
infrastructure would
be there for the next 50 years at least and any rational person would
have to
accept that we are now at a crossroads where there must be a
transparent evidence-based
decision made on preventing fossil gas in the Irish and European Energy
mix.
Is
gas cleaner than coal?
No. When
burned, gas produces less carbon dioxide emissions than coal or diesel
oil
locally, but it is what is not
burned - the purposeful (at
least 0.8%) and leaked/fugitive (at least 2.6%) methane emissions over
the full
life cycle, the non-territorial emissions - that is causing
the problem. Methane
Emissions are the Achilles' heel of natural gas (natural gas is 95%
Methane). Fracking
in the US, requiring hundreds of
thousands of disposable wells to be dug, as opposed to conventional
drilled gas
for example, is causing the huge spike of one third of all global
methane in
the last decade -methane
which is not
burned and therefore accelerating global warming by absorbing 87 times more
heat than carbon dioxide over a 20-year period.
When politicians and the
fossil fuel lobby speak about gas as a transitional fuel they obfuscate
the
impacts of purposeful and leaked/fugitive Methane emissions from
fracking on
the climate by making no distinction between
unconventional/fracked/shale gas
and conventional drilled gas. This is neither reasonable nor rational
especially when reducing methane emissions into the atmosphere may
reverse the
rate of global warming.
Are there other
impacts other than climate impacts?
Yes,
Ireland passed the 'Prohibition of
Onshore Hydraulic Fracturing Act 2017', banning fracking in
Ireland in
recognition of the health and climate impacts of exploiting shale gas
reserves;
Locally,
fracking poisons people (health) and creates environmental pollution.
The
process of fracking is harmful at source in the USA too, and it is
hypocritical
that we would recognise the harm in Ireland by banning fracking, but
then
create demand for it abroad by importing it.
Evidence
that the proposed Shannon LNG project by 'New Fortress Energy" is for
the
Importation of Fracked US gas
Shannon
LNG is being proposed as an LNG Import Terminal by its owners, New
Fortress Energy, to receive fracked gas from the one of the world's
largest natural gas fields, the Marcellus Shale Formation in
Pennsylvania, U.S.A. However, comments by politicians and some
individuals from public organisations that the sources of gas for the
proposed Shannon LNG terminal have not been specified yet are
attempting to cast doubt over this fact. We calculate that almost
100% of the Gas in Pennsylvania is fracked gas since
so-called
conventional wells are also being drilled in shale and also need to be
fracked. However, even if we take the more conservative approach of
only unconventional wells being fracked, then it is still proven from
official US figures that up to 97.85% of gas in Pennsylvania is fracked
gas. This paper puts forward the evidence that
Shannon LNG is a US fracked gas import project. This
information comes from the following sources:
1.
From the Company itself and it’s company filings to the US
Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) on November 9th, 2018 where
- New
Fortress Energy tells the SEC that " Certain of our suppliers employ
hydraulic fracturing techniques"
-
New Fortress Energy tells the SEC "Increased regulation or difficulty
in permitting of hydraulic fracturing, and any corresponding increase
in domestic natural gas prices, could materially adversely affect
demand for LNG and our ability to develop commercially viable LNG
facilities"
- New Fortress Energy admits to the SEC that
it "seeks to use “stranded” natural gas
to satisfy the world’s
large and growing power needs”[…] “We are
currently developing two
liquefiers in the Marcellus area of Pennsylvania, each of which is
expected to have the capacity to produce approximately 3 to 4 million
gallons of LNG"
- New Fortress Energy tells the SEC " Shannon,
Ireland – We have entered into an agreement to purchase all
of the
ownership interests in a project company that owns the rights to
develop and operate an LNG terminal and a CHP plant on the Shannon
Estuary near Ballylongford, Ireland [...] We intend to supply all
existing and future customers with LNG produced primarily at our own
Liquefaction Facilities. We have one operational liquefaction facility
in Miami, are currently are currently developing our Pennsylvania
Facilities and plan to develop five to ten additional liquefaction
facilities over the next five years"
2.
From the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP)
98.23% of Gas produced in Pennsylvania in 2018 was fracked gas
3.
From the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) at least 97.85% of
Gas produced in Pennsylvania in 2018 was fracked gas
4.
From the Methane Life Cycle Scientist Professor Robert Howarth, Cornell
University who informed the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Climate
Action on October 9th 2019 that “If Ireland were to import
liquefied
natural gas from the United States, it would largely be shale gas"
5.
From Richard Bruton, T.D., the Minister for Communications, Climate
Action and Environment himself who admitted on RTE Radio on May 10th
2019 that the gas coming from the US would be fracked gas
6. From Business and
Investment Media Reports on the Issue
7. From Industry
Analysis on the Issue
8.
From U.S. President Donald Trump on 23rd October 2019 who stated at the
9th Annual Shale Insight Conference in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania " they
won’t do any fracking in New York [...] They
don’t do it in New
York. Somebody, someday, will explain why. They do it in
Pennsylvania. They do it in Ohio."
EU
Commission accused of breaking Climate laws on
very day President announces European Green Deal
The
appeal was lodged following the shock written admission 5 days earlier
by the
Director General
of DG Energy herself - Mrs
Ditte Juul-Jorgensen –
that the Commission breached the EU PCI
Regulation by not evaluating climate impacts when assessing all the
proposed
gas PCI projects. This list includes the controversial Shannon LNG
project
being proposed for the large-scale importation of US fracked gas into
Europe. The Trans-Atlantic group of NGOs’ appeal
raised the accusation
that Trade Considerations for the importation of US fracked gas, as
agreed by
Presidents Trump and Juncker in July 2018, are dominating over Climate
in the
European Commission institutional mindset, forcing European Commission
staff to
illegally turn a blind eye to the disastrous Climate impacts of filthy
fracked
gas imports and blatantly commit discriminatory breaches of EU
Regulations in
the process.
By
law, the
potential overall benefits of each proposed project of common interest
must
outweigh its costs and the criteria to make this assessment must
include the
Sustainability Criteria,
which means reducing Emissions and Climate Impacts.
The
Director General claimed that the breach
of EU Regulations will be fixed for future
PCI lists but did not offer to do any climate impact assessment of the
currently proposed PCI list it approved, and which is currently before
the
European Parliament, rendering the entire PCI list legally unsafe due
to a
serious discriminatory breach of the PCI Regulation by DG Energy.
The
Climate activists were
reacting to the latest
peer-reviewed research which notes
that Methane is a greenhouse gas 100 times more powerful than
carbon-dioxide
and that shale gas
development in North America is the single largest driver of this
increase in
methane, accounting for one-third of the increase in global emissions
from all
sources.
The
appeal comes on the very day that President
Ursula Von der Leyen announced the adoption of the European
Green Deal. How the Commission deals with the carbon leakage
and
non-territorial emissions of US fracked gas imports into Europe on a
massive
scale which leave a carbon footprint 44% greater than that of coal will
quickly
reveal whether the European Green Deal is to signal real actions or
just
aspirations.
2. Any
such Energy Plan which will set the framework for any development
consent in
Ireland should include aStrategic
Environmental Assessment to assess reasonable alternatives.
3. The
European Parliament has the power to refuse to approve the 4th PCI list
as
proposed by the European Commission when it votes on the matter before
the end
of February 2020. This vote must assess the fact the European
Commission
illegally refused to assess the climate impacts of the gas projects on
the
list. The Commission asserting that it will do the climate impacts of
future
lists while hoping we turn a blind eye to the Commission breaks the law
for the
current list is unacceptable to the advantage of U.S. fracked gas
import
terminals. This is all the more important given the sanctions announced
by the
U.S. against Russian gas imports via the NordStream2 pipeline to
Germany.
4. We
need a vote in the Irish Parliament on the motion put forward by 44 Irish
parliamentarians
on the calling on the
Government: − to remove any project from the proposed
list of Projects of Common Interest that could support the building of
an LNG
facility in Ireland that will act as a gateway for fracked gas entering
the
Irish energy mix; and − to build support in Europe to
prioritise sustainability
criteria in the assessment of candidate PCI projects, that will address
fossil
fuel lock in and the long-term impacts of fracked gas in the European
energy
mix, given the expected change in climatic conditions.
5. We need a new law to ban the importation of
Fracked gas as proposed by the Youth Assembly, which may need the
banning of
the construction of LNG terminals because these terminals are the means
to
avoid Ireland becoming an overseas market for methane from US fracked
gas.
- Proposed Removal by Minister
Nichola Mallon of Permitted
Development Rights (PDR) for gas
exploration a dangerous sleight of hand signalling to the
Market that
Northern Ireland is open for gas exploration through planning
regulation of the petroleum and fracking industry before
any gas exploration policy decision is
made or any decision is taken on the current petroleum licensing
applications by the Northern Ireland Executive.