INTRODUCTION
PCI
accreditation from the European Commission is an extremely powerful initial
development consent for gas projects such as the proposed Shannon LNG US
fracked gas import terminal because it sets the framework for future development
consent within the Member States. Article 7 of the PCI Regulation states that "projects
of common interest shall be allocated the status of the
highest national significance possible and be treated as such in permit
granting processes". The Regulation goes on to state that
"With regard to the environmental impacts addressed in Article 6(4) of
Directive 92/43/EEC and Article 4(7) of Directive 2000/60/EC, projects of
common interest shall be considered as being of public interest from an energy
policy perspective and may be considered as being of overriding public interest,
provided that all the conditions set out in these Directives are fulfilled".
The boom
in proposed LNG import terminals throughout Europe is motivated by the
expansion of the US fracking industry which has moved the US from being a net
importer to an exporter of gas. However, this comes with a high environmental,
public health and climate change price. The most up-to-date scientific
knowledge is categorical on the following points: The number one climate threat
in Europe is fracked gas. Cornell University's Professor Robert Howarth, a
leading scientist in this area, states that this is no bridge fuel, that
switching from coal to shale gas is accelerating rather than slowing global
warming, that methane's impact on climate over 10 years is 105 times more potent
than carbon dioxide, that one half of Methane emissions in the US is coming
from Shale Gas Leakage and that, to put it simply, fracked gas is the dirtiest
of all fossil fuels with a bigger climate footprint than coal.
This was not the thinking over 10 years ago when the Shannon LNG project
initially obtained planning permission.
Indeed, DG Trade, in
its final Trade Sustainability Impact Assessment (SIA) on the Transatlantic
Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) between the EU and the USA in
March 2017, citing the UN Framework Convention on
Climate Change (UNFCCC), the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement found that
while a shift to gas away from coal in the EU could lead to some environmental
gains "locally", "environmental benefits from LNG over coal
(which are debatable due to methane leakage during extraction and energy needed
during production, conversion and transport) are perhaps even negative if a combination
of LNG+coal crowded out ‘greener’ energy sources such as renewables in the
global energy mix".
However, The European
Commission is proceeding, nevertheless, with the implementation of the Energy
Plan to import fracked US gas announced by President
Juncker in July 2018 following his visit to President
Trump in the USA through multiple LNG terminals and countries and imposed via
the PCI procedure. We assert that this represents unlawful State Aid and Misuse
of aid at each Member State Level and is also a breach of the SEA Directive,
which requires an assessment of reasonable alternatives before a plan. A project is not allowed to have the PCI status unless
it is approved by the Member State because Article 3.3(a) of Regulation
347/2013 states "each individual proposal for a project of common
interest shall require the approval of the Member States, to whose territory
the project relates". The current PCI list was approved by Ireland on
17th October 2017.
Shannon LNG is applying once more for
inclusion on the 4th PCI list on the grounds that it promotes diversification
and gives security of supply to Ireland. However, this criteria is not
fulfilled since the N-1 condition through a joint risk approach where Ireland and the UK are treated as a
single region was already achieved and will be enhanced
with the completion of the construction of the twinning of the second
independent interconnector from Brighouse to Cluden in Scotland (PCI 5.2). The
PCI 5.2 Twinning of the Interconnector for the final 50km in Scotland already
brings security of supply to Ireland with 2 completely independent
interconnectors, representing 2 separate pieces of gas infrastructure. In
addition, the European Commission itself recognises that Ireland and the UK
represent the one "area" in the gas region that is the North-South gas
interconnections in Western Europe (‘NSI West Gas’) priority corridor. The UK already has access to US fracked gas imports with
the first fracked gas imports arriving to the UK in September 2018. This also
means that the security of supply and competition criteria put forward by
Shannon LNG will not be met technically because the UK already has access to
appropriate connections, diversion of supply sources, supplying counterparts
and routes .
If anything, an LNG terminal for fracked US gas in Ireland will
create fossil fuel lock in and compromise the development of the indigenous
biogas industry, which could help in the reduction of the GHG emissions from
the agricultural sector. Developing domestic renewable energy sources could
enhance the country’s energy security in the middle to long term
Ireland
banned both fracking and the importation of fracked gas. Why is there no
consideration of fracked gas in the energy mix of what is being supplied under
the generic heading of “LNG”? Only one
Member State is affected - Ireland - unless the aim is to export gas from Shannon
LNG to the UK (once the PCI project of the Reverse Flow of the Interconnector
to Moffat is implemented) , benefiting from lower corporation tax in Ireland
and the implementation of the US-EU trade deal. The Trade Deal should have
nothing to do with the PCI process.
Ultimately, the Shannon LNG project in
particular, and the importation of fracked US gas to Europe in general, is a
highly politically-motivated energy plan which is favouring trade over climate,
which gives strong support for the removal of Shannon LNG from the proposed
list of Projects of Common Interest.
Click Here to Download full PCI Submission by Safety Before LNG |